Skills Insights gives you two views to analyze competencies across your organization. Gap Analysis shows where employees stand compared to expected skill levels, while Proficiency Distribution reveals how skills are spread throughout your team. Both views help you make informed decisions about training, hiring, and team development.
📌 Note: Skills Insights requires skills assigned to employees. Learn how to Assign skills to employees
Understanding the two views
Skills Insights provides two complementary ways to analyze your team's capabilities.
Gap Analysis
Gap Analysis compares current skill levels against the expectations set in your skill mappings. This view answers the question: “Are our people where they need to be?”
You'll see:
How many employees meet expected proficiency levels
Who exceeds expectations, and by how much
Who needs development, and in which areas
Color-coded indicators showing gap severity
Proficiency Distribution
Proficiency Distribution shows the spread of skill levels across your organization without considering expectations. This view answers: “What does our skill landscape actually look like?”
You'll see:
How many people are at each proficiency level
Concentration of expertise or gaps in coverage
Heat map visualization of skill distribution
Patterns across departments or positions
Tip: Use Gap Analysis for performance reviews and development planning. Use Proficiency Distribution for workforce planning and hiring decisions.
Accessing Skills Insights
Navigate to Development > Skills Insights.
Choose your view:
Gap Analysis to compare against expectations
Proficiency Distribution to see overall spread
Using Gap Analysis
Gap Analysis helps you identify where employees need support and where they're excelling.
Reading the Gap Analysis view
The main view displays all skills grouped by area of expertise. For each skill, you'll see:
Number of employees assessed for that skill
Number of proficiency levels in your scale
Color-coded indicators showing gap severity
The color scheme indicates the importance of the gap:
Dark green: employees exceed expectations
Green: employees are at the expected level
Red: employees are below expectations
Drilling down into a specific skill
Click on any skill to open a detailed drawer showing three categories of employees:
To Improve: employees below expected proficiency, with the level gap shown
Meets Expectations: employees at the exact expected level
Strong: employees above expected proficiency, with the level gap shown
Click any category to view the list of employees and their specific proficiency gaps.
Example: for “Python Programming”:
To Improve (5): employees 1-2 levels below expected
Meets Expectations (12): employees at exactly the expected level
Strong (3): employees 1-2 levels above expected
Using Proficiency Distribution
Proficiency Distribution shows how skill levels are spread across your organization.
Reading the Proficiency Distribution view
Skills are grouped by area of expertise. For each skill, you'll see:
Number of employees assessed for that skill
Number of proficiency levels available
Heat map visualization showing distribution across levels
Understanding the color coding
The heat map uses shading, not distinct colors, to show employee concentration at each proficiency level:
0%: no employees at this level (lightest)
1-5%: very few employees (light)
6-12%: some employees (medium)
13-24%: moderate concentration (darker)
25% or more: high concentration (darkest)
This helps you quickly spot:
Bottlenecks: too many employees at the beginner level
Coverage gaps: no one at the expert level
Strengths: high concentration at the advanced levels
Example: for “Customer Communication”:
Proficiency level | Employees assessed | Shading band |
Beginner | 15 (30%) | Darkest (25%+ band) |
Intermediate | 25 (50%) | Darkest (25%+ band) |
Advanced | 7 (15%) | Darker (13-24% band) |
Expert | 2 (5%) | Light (1-5% band) |
This shows most of your team sits at the beginner or intermediate level, with very few employees at expert. That combination is both a bottleneck and a coverage gap.
Drilling down into distribution
Click on any skill to view:
A detailed breakdown by proficiency level
The list of employees at each level
Department or position distribution
Click a specific proficiency level to see which employees are at that level.
Filtering Skills Insights
Both views use the same filters, so you only need to learn them once.
Position: narrow the view to one or more roles
Area of Expertise: focus on a skill category, for example “Soft Skills” or “Technical Skills”
Group: limit the view to a department or team
Search: find a specific skill by name
Tip: Filter by position to identify role-specific training needs. For example, filter to “Product Manager” to see which skills your PM team needs to develop.
Practical examples
Example 1: Identifying training priorities
Scenario: you're planning Q1 training budget and need to prioritize investments.
Using Gap Analysis:
Navigate to Skills Insights > Gap Analysis.
Filter by Area of Expertise: Technical Skills.
Identify skills with the most critical gaps (red indicators).
Result: you discover 15 engineers are 2+ levels below expected in “System Architecture.” This becomes your top training priority.
Example 2: Workforce planning
Scenario: you're hiring and need to know where your team has coverage gaps.
Using Proficiency Distribution:
Navigate to Skills Insights > Proficiency Distribution.
Filter by Group: Engineering Department.
Look for skills with 0% or a low percentage at the expert level.
Result: you see only 5% of engineers are at the expert level in “Database Optimization.” Your next hire should be a senior database specialist.
Example 3: Succession planning
Scenario: your senior designer is leaving. You need to know if anyone can step up.
Using Gap Analysis:
Navigate to Skills Insights > Gap Analysis.
Filter by Position: Product Designer.
Click on critical skills like “Design Leadership.”
Check the “Strong” category for employees exceeding expectations.
Result: you identify two mid-level designers who are already performing above their expected level, making them strong candidates for promotion.
Example 4: Department health check
Scenario: you want to understand your customer success team's overall skill readiness.
Using both views:
Run Gap Analysis filtered by Group: Customer Success to see where the team meets or exceeds expectations.
Run Proficiency Distribution for the same group to see whether skills are concentrated at lower levels or spread evenly.
Result: you discover the team meets expectations overall, but 80% of the team is clustered at the intermediate level. You need to develop more advanced practitioners.
Frequently asked questions
Why don't I see any data in Skills Insights?
Why don't I see any data in Skills Insights?
Skills Insights requires three things:
Active skill mappings with expected proficiency levels set
Employees assigned to positions connected to those mappings
Skills assessed either on employee profiles or through reviews
If you're missing any of these, Skills Insights shows empty states.
How often does Skills Insights update?
How often does Skills Insights update?
Skills Insights updates in real time. When you assess a skill on an employee profile or complete a review with skill assessments, the data appears immediately.
Can I export Skills Insights data?
Can I export Skills Insights data?
Currently, Skills Insights is view-only within the platform. To share insights with stakeholders, take screenshots or use the filtering options to generate specific reports for presentation.
What's the difference between Gap Analysis and Proficiency Distribution?
What's the difference between Gap Analysis and Proficiency Distribution?
Gap Analysis compares current skills against the expected levels in your skill mappings, showing who needs development and who exceeds expectations. Proficiency Distribution shows the actual spread of skill levels without considering expectations, revealing concentration patterns and coverage gaps. Use Gap Analysis for performance management, and Proficiency Distribution for workforce and hiring decisions.


